DIY Wood Pegs

Continuing the discussion from Pre-Made Alternatives to German Wood Pegs:

Sounds like we could share some tips on making our own pegs, in addition to finding other sources of pre-made ones!

I’ve got some limited experience here, starting with my second pair of boots from scratch. Since then, I’ve done some more experimenting.

Current Razor Saw Setup

I’ve made my cleanest pegs so far with a mini aluminum mitre box, razor saws, and a Stanley-style utility blade for pointing. For the wood, I’ve bought small slats of hardwood marketed for people who collect samples of different wood species.

It’s a time-consuming, fiddly dust-producing process. But you can get some very nice pegs, from whatever what you can get your hands on.

My mitre box is an old X-Acto one, but I generally prefer Excel for these kinds tools these days.The handles feel sturdier, they tend to have four-jaw chucks instead of two-jaw, they’re made in the USA, and widely available where I live.

This kind of thing is available much cheaper on sites like Amazon than on Excel’s own site right now.

That said, for disposable mini razor saws, I actually prefer the Japanese pull-style:

This is a Razorsaw-brand “Flush Cutting Saw Double Edge”, Number 1151. I paid well less than $20 for mine online, some months back.

I also see these listed as “Gyokucho” products—they may have renamed themselves. The Japanese term for this kind of saw seems to be “kugihiki”, and there may be other makers. A number of woodworking tool sellers market them from trimming dowels.

As for the wood, Woodworkers Source, a division of MacBeath Hardwood, sells species samples online. They’re sized specifically to mail cheaply via USPS, and currently come in under $10 each for all but the most exotic species.

https://www.woodworkerssource.com/search.html?Search=sample

I haven’t quite pinned down how best to build a fence in the mitre box, so I can repeatably set the wood in place to cut 2.5mm slats. I’ve just been doing it by eye, guess and check. The size is small enough that the kerf of of the saw matters, as well as placement within the 90° guide slot of the mitre box.

Method

With the saws, the general method is to:

  1. Rough cut blocks from the sample that fit in the mitre box and run somewhat longer than the finished pegs. I’ve generally gone about an inch long so far, with a plan to trim them to length with cobbler’s pincers when I’m pegging.

  2. Saw thin slats off those blocks the width of your intended pegs. I’ve been shooting for between 2 and 3 millimeters.

  3. Saw the slats into matchsticks. You can also do this step by splitting, though with more irregular results.

  4. Point the pegs by whittling one end.

The thing to keep in mind throughout is grain direction. You want the long grain of the wood running parallel to the long axis of the finished pegs.

Alternative: Splitting

I’ve had some success making pegs of a target size by splitting off slats and individual pegs with a small chisel. However, the vast majority of these pegs are noticeably irregular, not nicely square. They also vary uncontrollably in width, with the grain along which they split.

In practice, splitting let me churn out more pegs faster, but at the cost of having to sort the end products as an extra step, rejecting lots as too thin or too thick. I also found myself doing far more whittling of individual pegs, to bring more “within spec”.

On the other hand, the irregular look could be its own valid style choice. For reproducing some historical footwear, it might be more correct, though I’ve gathered from a few sources that fully pegged outsoles—where the pegs are more visible—largely arose with the mass production of pegs, which therefore looked more uniform.

Alternative: Historic Factory Method

@Customboots gave me a reference that led to some reading on how factories in New England manufactured pegs. Their method was the opposite of the one I’ve tried so far: First they’d route a bunch of tips into the end grain of a block, by making two runs of parallel v-groove cuts at ninety degrees. Then they’d split into slats and individual pegs by driving splitters into the valleys between points.

I found an old tool collectors’ article about handplanes that were adapted to cut these v-grooves.

The Plane that Tried.pdf (2.6 MB)

However, the article reports these must have been very rare. They tried to reproduce one, needed a machinist, and also found it needed a lot of initial tuning.

It might be possible to imitate this with hand tools using a small triangular file. Mark a grid of lines on the end grain of a block, route out the points using the file, then split.

Alternative: Parallel Circular Saws

The Last Shoemaker has a short video showing how they make their own wood pegs:

It’s only shown very briefly, but they seem to be using a set of circular blades mounted between spacers on a lathe or bench grinder.

1 Like

I’ve been doing research on Hyer Boot Company all day. I found a newspaper article from around 1940 where they featured multiple craftspeople working for Hyer. One was a man pegging cowboy boot soles and they specifically mentioned that the pegs were Birch wood.
I think it’s time to accept that Jack Reed made up “lemonwood pegs” and fooled everyone, and let that go. They were not and never have been “lemonwood.”

2 Likes

This is my new favorite bootmaking apocrypha. Lemonwood the term will never die now, he’s made a permanent mark on history through sheer BSing :laughing:

2 Likes

Man this is great research! I like the wilder book method best in theory except without a mitre box i cant get those saws to cut straight to save my life

1 Like

Lemonwood Tall Tale

All the sources I’ve seen on early US commercial shoe peg production point northeast. When they mention species, it’s birch. That makes sense: birch grows up there, it’s plentiful, and it works.

Eric Meier’s Wood Database page for “lemonwood” clarifies that “lemonwood” is actually calycophyllum candidissimum, not the trees that grow lemons. The lemonwood trees grow in Cuba, Central America, and South America. There are apparently some in Mexico, but importing at that time, not as finished pegs, but as unfinished wood?

One of these answers seems obvious, the other highly unlikely.

But what is the best?

@Customboots, I guess the real question today is what the best wood for shoe pegs is. Since we’re all spoiled globalists, for better and worse, we can just go buy it and make pegs out of it, whatever it is.

Maybe it’s the pertiest, like a blood-red bloodwood or African padauk, or purpleheart. Maybe it’s a responsible alternative to piano-black ebony, like katalox or Macassar. Maybe it’s the strongest or the toughest—whatever those are.

Maybe basically any hardwoods driven in tight do the job, and it’s really a blank canvas, like cowboy boot tops. In that case, what’s to stop us making cool designs with mixtures of round pegs and square ones, fat ones and skinny ones, in all kinds of different woods?

Well, accidentally driving our pegging awls into shanks, apparently. I’ve got a long way to go to be Wood Peg Michaelangelo over here.

1 Like

By my reckoning, this is firmly within the tradition.

If you haven’t read the paper on cowboy boot history @Customboots has for free download through her store, don’t miss it. Here:

Very much worth the candle.

Yes i loved the story so much i tracked down a copy for my library :slight_smile:


Now i can roll my eyes whenever i get shown one of those Hyer ads for “we invented cowboy boots”. Unless Lisa uncovered something new in her research…

1 Like

No round pegs. It’s important to put square pegs in a round hole, because the tension of forcing a square peg into a round hole helps it hold tighter.

Yeah, the more I learn about “lemonwood” the more convinced I am that there’s zero truth to pegs being made of it. When you have to work really hard to make all the pieces fit, the most obvious answer is that you’re putting them together wrong.

2 Likes

Oh man I’m salivating over the idea of a purple heart pegged boot. That would look awesome. We need to figure out an efficient and consistent method for making a few dozen at a time from whatever hardwood makes sense for a given design.
Is there anyone you know of playing with exotic pegs?

1 Like

Manually Route Out Grid of Points, Then Split

I received my wood samples from Woodworkers Source today. It came via FedEx, rather than USPS. Fancy!

Here’s the hard/rock/sugar maple sample as it came, with the exception of the line I drew on it to saw the first 1-inch slat:





The grain runs lengthswise, like a full-size board.

I decided to go ahead and try making maple pegs using the factory-style method described in some of the sources. Step by step:

  • Cut a 1-inch off the sample. An inch long in the direction of the grain.
  • Mount the slat end-up in a vice.
  • Mark lines 2.5 mm apart going one direction. I mostly did this by marking 5 mm increments, then marking halfway between by eye.
  • Draw lines across the end grain at the marks, then saw a shallow slit through the wood along it. I tried all the saws I had lying around, and this was easiest done with a very fine-toothed coping saw or even hacksaw blade. The most important was having the blade under high tension. My usual go-to Japanese-style razorsaw was less effective for this.
  • Stick a triangular file in each slit and rasp for three or so passes in each, to make it triangular.
  • Pare the far edges on each side to about 45 degrees with a chisel.
  • Turn the vise 90 degrees and repeat the process of marking, sawing, rasping out, and paring a grid of triangular trenches.
  • Set a chisel in each short trench and tap to split. Gentle taps are best. Hitting harder than needed to split can drive the chisel into the side of a slat.
  • Split the small slats into individual pegs by rocking a narrow chisel into the gap between the points. You only need to split the wood at the pointed end. You can pull the pegs apart with your fingers from there.









Room for Improvements

I’m not quite happy with the pointiness of the points I was able to make as a grid. I suspect a small, acute v-gouge, rather than a triangular metal file like I used, might do better.

To improve yield of right-size pegs, I could have done a better job sanding down the two edges of the slat after making the points, to remove the extra length and width left over after dividing by 2.5 mm. I was thinking some of thicker ones might do as heel pegs, but if they’re wide enough one way, they’re still skinny in the other.

I nailed myself pretty good with a chisel. This was before acting on the conclusion that it really doesn’t take a chisel to split slats or pegs once the pioints have been cut. A flat-blade screwdriver is fine.

I’m curious how these stack up to Blau Ring in terms of dimensions and uniformity. My intuitive sense is that splitting carved-tip-down does help guide where they split a bit more consistently, but that no kind of splitting is going to compete with sawing for dimensional accuracy and uniformity. Some pegs just plain split out fatter toward the point than the top, because that’s just how the grain runs.

Sawing with rotating blades spaced apart, like The Last Shoemaker’s video shows, could be the ticket, if it can be done safely. There’s more wood waste as kerf there, but that seems quite acceptable. It would also take cutting off sheets of the right thickness to start. For small enough slats, that could be a table saw with the blade raised up.

1 Like

I like the idea of split better than sawn, if only for the reason that split means you have continuous grains all the way down the peg, and that just seems more mechanically sound than sawn where the length of each grain, and also the introduction of open ends of grain along the shaft that can splinter and introduce new fault lines, is at the mercy of grain straightness and alignment of the saw with the grain. Of course if grain deviates or gets knotty in the split method the result is uneven width or shape

In practice, folks will likely be splitting pegs from sawn wood, so any pegs taken from the edges will have at least one sawn face. That’s going to be a particularly large percentage of total pegs when working from small wood samples, like I did.

I suppose you could just discard the edge pegs. That would also solve the divided-by-x remainder issue. But that wood just goes to waste. Might still be less waste than all the kerf sawing every peg on each side.

Looks-wise, many split pegs look irregular, even just their heads. I do think uniform, recognizable shapes would look nicer. So for pretty, you’re sorting though pegs for pretty ones. Maybe also picking through the scrap bin at the hardwood store for the straightest grain you can find, to start from.

A really clean line of pegs of a wood that isn’t birch is shaping up to be quite the flex. Lots of time.

For function, irregular might actually be better, in and of itself. I don’t actually have much of a good way to think about peg working strength, apart from maybe tensile strength of the wood species along the grain. But where durability’s a real concern, I think you coat the pegs with glue, even if some makers have done fine without it. Embrace overkill, just like with the soles.

Amen on overkill! Better than the alternative. I agree probably broken grains on the edges would not lead to tension failure within the peg, since there are so many leftover grains in the center, but i guess i do worry about splintering of open grains on the edge as they are driven in. But maybe that doesn’t turn out to be a problem irl, and its just overthinking and overkill. Thats where, if the answer is important, its probably useful to do some experimenting, drive in a bunch of both and try to get a good cross section and see what they look like maybe. of course the more definitive experiment would be to build with both and see when or if there is peg failure, especially staying blind to which pegs were used. Or I bet an experienced boot repair person could give us some insight into what the common modes of peg failure are and if there seems to be a pattern re: brand or maker and whether they used square awls and/or glue etc. In the meantime all you have is theory and tradition. Theory is fun to talk about but can still leave you wondering on best approaches especially when talking about durability. Tradition is a funny business that is a mix of natural selection - the things that really dont work tend to get filtered out with time either by conscious rejection by the maker, or by going out of business because of failure or unnecessary cost…. But other parts of tradition - particularly the parts that are inconsequential to durability because they are massive overkill for the forces involved, address a problem that is not really a problem, or because they are a matter of style and taste - tend to get carried along with a certain hand-waving mystique that poses as reason, and if you point out that “well the other guy does another way and it works just fine” then the fallback argument becomes one of dogma - “the right way” “how i was taught” “the old masters”. Which is fine! And maybe the best part of it is seeing where the culture of the trades meets science - some things are done the same by everyone, that’s usually a flag that there is a core physical principle involved. And some things vary a lot, which usually means that either no way is better; or the goals are different- durability versus appearance, or minimizing time effort and cost. or, if you want to increase production all while protecting against fluctuations in the availability of skilled labor, how can you change parts of the process from several boots moving in parallel from start to finish with one maker each, to an assembly line where each worker is skilled in one aspect like small shops do, or each job is done by a machine run by much more replaceable inexpert labor like factories do. Did I read somewhere that Lama Hyer Justin Lucchese and some of those generation were early adopters assembly line models? but for hobbyists, artists, and craftspeople, respecting a tradition might actually be a goal, regardless of whether something works better or is just overkill. Which is awesome! Anyway im sure this is all something Sarah Guerin or Amara Hark-Weber has said much better but in MFA language that’s over my head :laughing:
All that being said, also part of the fun of being a hobbyist is that you can play a little without risking profit loss or angering your foremothers; analyzing the physics of the problem and asking - if we were to have the goal of truly maximizing the overkill, how can we model the forces involved and maximize each? That’s pretty fun too.

Kyle you’ll tell me if my rambling is overkill wont you? :slight_smile:

Oh and I ordered some lemonwood. Its a lot more than I need happy to send you some if you’d like to play with it too

Why not start a new topic asking directly for cobbler input about peg failures in the wild, then send a link to some cobblers and see if they’ll join us here and weigh in?

1 Like

Ok good idea, i can think of a couple of boot repair folks ive seen that are internet active, Bryan Stamps, Scott Maddox, Paul Krause, jim brainerd,

1 Like

Looking like a busy week at work so far this week, ill probably send out some invites later in the week

1 Like

Here’s a video showing a process for making wood nails, very similar to the process I’d tried for shoe pegs:

However, the maker first splits square pegs oversize, and then drives them through a broached hole, narrowing to size.

1 Like

Got the basswood in seemed to work ok. I did a single bevel. Im not experienced but it didnt seem any harder than a whittled tip to set it and drive it. I think thats because once you start it it rounds out and looks like its centered after passing through a layer each of sole and insole leather. Picture is the dowel, cut, and after driving through on the bottom row. Top row is the birch pegs from SNF pre and post driving

1 Like

Cool!

After seeing your comment, I checked in the back of my local art supply store and found a display of basswood sticks. Later on, I found much the same at my local ACE Hardware store. The displays seem to have both balsa and basswood. Both locations had 1/8 and 5/32 square sticks, I believe 32″ long, for less than a dollar. I got one of each but haven’t tried them yet.

1/8 inch is 3.175 mm, so about 50% thicker than 5½/12 Blau Ring pegs. 5/32 inch is nearly exactly 4 mm, so abouot twice as thick.

At the same time, I’d expect basswood might compress more when struck in. The Wood Database material properties for basswood and paper birch suggest basswood is a bit weaker than birch, but obviously far stronger than balsa.